PHILM PHREAKS‎ > ‎

AREA 51



AREA 51


Written and Directed by Oren Peli
 
Review by Theron Moore

 
 
I don’t think I’m going too far when I boldly assert that the new sci-fi thriller, “Area 51,” has been the most talked about, anticipated UFO genre film since Spielberg made “Close Encounters of the Third Kind” in 1977.  And when I heard the film was made found footage style with Oren Peli of “Paranormal Activity” fame writing and directing it, I was honestly over the moon, I couldn’t wait.  So the $64,000 question is, did I like it, was it good?  The answer:  An overwhelming YES.

Here’s the long and short of it.  A group of young adults, led by the intrepid Reid, hatch a plan to break into Area 51.  Along for the ride is a girl whose father worked at Area 51 and died under mysterious circumstances.  Amongst the assortment of important papers he left behind is a map that’ll guide our heroes in their quest to discover what secrets are kept at the base.

The kids have figured out a way to breach the perimeter and enter the facility.  And if you’re saying to yourself “why haven’t the Russians or Chinese figured this out yet,” that’s called a plot complication.  Leave it alone.  Just go with it.  Remember, it’s only a movie, it’s not meant to be real.

Inside Area 51 we finally see what it looks like.  The first floor is office space.   Everything else beyond that is industrial & scientific.  Lots of concrete, metal piping, gauges, air ducts and vault like rooms.  Nothing fancy.  It’s sparse, even bleak not to mention huge.  It’s located a mile underground with 40+ floors.   Eventually we see a lab chock full of creepy strangeness, a captured UFO and become privy to things we should never be witness to.  And that’s where I stop.  I won’t go any further because I don’t want to give the movie away.  Even if you hate found footage movies give “Area 51” an honest shot.  It has some real, genuine tense moments plus Peli’s vision of Area 51 is quite compelling in and of itself.
The obvious criticism, though, is that it plays out like a video game, like a “first shooter,” but that’s the downside of making a found footage movie, it’s going to have this look and feel about it since it’s primarily first person perspective.  And like most Oren Peli projects “Area 51” takes its time building the plot before we really get into the “meat” of the movie somewhere around the 35-40 minute mark slowly building suspense and tension in the viewer, priming us for whatever horrors might reside inside the non-existent base later on.

And we briefly see the aliens, quick shots, that’s it; Peli’s signature technique he developed with his prior movies, showing us only what we need to see and nothing more.   I know this bothered many people who were expecting some kind of big CGI reveal but it’s the fleeting glimpse of whatever these creatures are that get inside your head and play mind games with you.  It’s not necessarily what you see that frightens you but rather what you don’t see, that may be hiding or watching you from afar, that truly terrifies you.  Peli has effectively used the power of mystery as a weapon to attack the viewer with.

The movie was shot in three distinct acts – Act I:  Introduction to the characters.   Act II:  The build up to Area 51.  Act III:  Inside Area 51.  He also did a fantastic job blending genres with this film effectively making “Area 51” both a horror movie and sci-fi thriller, treading that fine line without going too far in either direction.
I use the term “horror movie” in the sense that the actual facility in the film can be thought of as a gigantic haunted house -- there’s “something” evil in there, maybe many evil “things;” lurking, waiting.  And our protagonists have to enter Area 51, this “haunted house,” complete their mission, confront the evil and not get killed in the process. 

The sci-fi thriller aspect of “Area 51” is what drives the movie and triggers the horror component creating suspense, building slowly, methodically, upping the scare factor so when we do see the aliens, what little we do see, we’re scared, and when we see the UFO or the mad scientist lab we’re properly shocked and amazed.
I’ve read negative reviews of “Area 51” and I think it may have to do with the fact that a lot of moviegoers have been brainwashed by Hollywood and their overuse of CGI special FX.  Nowadays movie plots seem secondary to the special effects which more often than not are tasked with telling a story and in some cases, become characters within the film itself.   It’s almost like we’ve become so used to the big Hollywood FX that when it comes to this style of film making we instantly go ADHD and hate the film.

Peli makes movies the old fashioned way.  He tells stories and he takes time telling you these stories.  He builds suspense, hits you with a kidney punch then ends the movie abruptly, not allowing you to process what you’ve seen.  He makes you feel uncomfortable and he’s good at it.

From what I was told, there was no script per se just a treatment and the actors were basically told to improvise their parts with the majority of the movie being shot in one take so the film itself has that real time, quick feel to it, as if it’s happening right here, right now.

If you’re looking for fast food movie making with lots of big, loud, flashy CGI and need a UFO fix watch “Independence Day.”  If you’re interested in something more, something with teeth and edge, watch “Area 51.”  It won’t win Academy Awards but it damn well entertains.


Comments